🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.arch.storage
Article #164

Re: Query: Solid State SCSI Systems

#164
From: Charlie Cassidy
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 14:51
43 lines
2977 bytes
In article <1992Dec17.035909.1127@ksmith.uucp>, keith@ksmith.uucp (Keith
Smith) writes:
|>Hmm, With a screamer Mag disk running around $2-3 a meg and this guy
|>maybe around $50-100 your application is gonna really have to demand Ultra
|>High speed disk memory to use it...  Of course with the way memory
|>prices go pricing could drop,  Also with cheap CPU's capable of addressing
|>Gigs now, and Terabytes in the near future, I'm not sure of the
|>viability of this technology,  Would seem more prudent to stuff the RAM
|>on the BUS (or BUSes) directly.  I dunno.
|>-- 
|>Keith Smith          uunet!ksmith!keith            5719 Archer Rd.
|>Digital Designs      BBS 1-919-423-4216            Hope Mills, NC
|>28348-2201
|>Somewhere in the Styx of North Carolina ...
|>

For our SDI and DSSI solid state disks, most of the usage has been where
the disk access paradigm and the nonvolatility of SSD is important. 
Most of the systems have been transaction processing systems of one sort
or another.  Examples include financial trading, order entry and
inventory control, and telecommunications (700, 800 and 900
translation).

Another thing that these have in common is that they justified the expense of 
SSD based on the business result (more financial trades = more $$$) rather than
the price/performance comparison to magnetic disk.

If the application supports putting the data in main memory (or you have a 
RAMdisk driver available), and the volatility of main memory is not a problem,
by all means main memory is a higher performance solution.  

--
==============================================================================
"Good things can happen, and frequently do, to people as brainy and footsy
as you." - Dr. Seuss
==============================================================================
Charlie Cassidy                        Internet: cassidy@memory.enet.dec.com
Digital Equipment Corporation          Amateur Radio: charlie@n1hlr.ampr.org
SSD Engineering - SHR1-4/O11
333 South Street                       This posting reflects the opinion of 
Shrewsbury, MA 01545                   the author, not Digital Equipment Corp
==============================================================================
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1992Dec22.145145.18125@nntpd.lkg.dec.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!darwin.sura.net!haven.umd.edu!decuac!pa.dec.com!nntpd2.cxo.dec.com!nntpd.lkg.dec.com!esd55.enet.dec.com!cassidy
References: <1992Nov10.021022.14711@news.arc.nasa.gov> <1992Nov16.161020.11319@ksmith.uucp> <1992Dec1.151630.12076@nntpd.lkg.dec.com> <1992Dec17.035909.1127@ksmith.uucp>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.arch.storage
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!darwin.sura.net!haven.umd.edu!decuac!pa.dec.com!nntpd2.cxo.dec.com!nntpd.lkg.dec.com!esd55.enet.dec.com!cassidy
From: cassidy@esd55.enet.dec.com (Charlie Cassidy)
Subject: Re: Query: Solid State SCSI Systems 
Message-ID: <1992Dec22.145145.18125@nntpd.lkg.dec.com>
Lines: 43
Sender: usenet@nntpd.lkg.dec.com (USENET News System)
Reply-To: cassidy@memory.enet.dec.com
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation
References: <1992Nov10.021022.14711@news.arc.nasa.gov> <1992Nov16.161020.11319@ksmith.uucp> <1992Dec1.151630.12076@nntpd.lkg.dec.com> <1992Dec17.035909.1127@ksmith.uucp>
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 14:51:45 GMT