Article View: comp.arch.storage
Article #164Re: Query: Solid State SCSI Systems
From: Charlie Cassidy
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 14:51
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 14:51
43 lines
2977 bytes
2977 bytes
In article <1992Dec17.035909.1127@ksmith.uucp>, keith@ksmith.uucp (Keith Smith) writes: |>Hmm, With a screamer Mag disk running around $2-3 a meg and this guy |>maybe around $50-100 your application is gonna really have to demand Ultra |>High speed disk memory to use it... Of course with the way memory |>prices go pricing could drop, Also with cheap CPU's capable of addressing |>Gigs now, and Terabytes in the near future, I'm not sure of the |>viability of this technology, Would seem more prudent to stuff the RAM |>on the BUS (or BUSes) directly. I dunno. |>-- |>Keith Smith uunet!ksmith!keith 5719 Archer Rd. |>Digital Designs BBS 1-919-423-4216 Hope Mills, NC |>28348-2201 |>Somewhere in the Styx of North Carolina ... |> For our SDI and DSSI solid state disks, most of the usage has been where the disk access paradigm and the nonvolatility of SSD is important. Most of the systems have been transaction processing systems of one sort or another. Examples include financial trading, order entry and inventory control, and telecommunications (700, 800 and 900 translation). Another thing that these have in common is that they justified the expense of SSD based on the business result (more financial trades = more $$$) rather than the price/performance comparison to magnetic disk. If the application supports putting the data in main memory (or you have a RAMdisk driver available), and the volatility of main memory is not a problem, by all means main memory is a higher performance solution. -- ============================================================================== "Good things can happen, and frequently do, to people as brainy and footsy as you." - Dr. Seuss ============================================================================== Charlie Cassidy Internet: cassidy@memory.enet.dec.com Digital Equipment Corporation Amateur Radio: charlie@n1hlr.ampr.org SSD Engineering - SHR1-4/O11 333 South Street This posting reflects the opinion of Shrewsbury, MA 01545 the author, not Digital Equipment Corp ==============================================================================
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Dec22.145145.18125@nntpd.lkg.dec.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!darwin.sura.net!haven.umd.edu!decuac!pa.dec.com!nntpd2.cxo.dec.com!nntpd.lkg.dec.com!esd55.enet.dec.com!cassidyReferences:
<1992Nov10.021022.14711@news.arc.nasa.gov> <1992Nov16.161020.11319@ksmith.uucp> <1992Dec1.151630.12076@nntpd.lkg.dec.com> <1992Dec17.035909.1127@ksmith.uucp>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.arch.storage Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!darwin.sura.net!haven.umd.edu!decuac!pa.dec.com!nntpd2.cxo.dec.com!nntpd.lkg.dec.com!esd55.enet.dec.com!cassidy From: cassidy@esd55.enet.dec.com (Charlie Cassidy) Subject: Re: Query: Solid State SCSI Systems Message-ID: <1992Dec22.145145.18125@nntpd.lkg.dec.com> Lines: 43 Sender: usenet@nntpd.lkg.dec.com (USENET News System) Reply-To: cassidy@memory.enet.dec.com Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation References: <1992Nov10.021022.14711@news.arc.nasa.gov> <1992Nov16.161020.11319@ksmith.uucp> <1992Dec1.151630.12076@nntpd.lkg.dec.com> <1992Dec17.035909.1127@ksmith.uucp> Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 14:51:45 GMT