RAID 1 or 5 ?

Article View: comp.arch.storage

Article #433

#433

From: Kenneth Soh BTM Singapore
Date: Sun, 25 Jul 1999 00:00

12 lines
953 bytes

Hi,

If I am interested in having storage fault tolerant up to
2 x HD failure, which option will be good ?

Option #1 RAID 1 with 4 HDs, i.e. 2 pairs
Option #2 RAID 5 with 4 HDs, i.e. 3 in group, 1 standby

Please cc your reply to kensoh@pacific.net.sg

Thanks and regards,
Kenneth

Technical Details

Message-ID: <7nl85m$3nn$1@newton.pacific.net.sg>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f4d7c,813a29bed80cb2f6,start
X-Google-Attributes: gidf4d7c,public
X-Google-Thread: 1144af,813a29bed80cb2f6,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid1144af,public
X-Google-Thread: 10e1c8,813a29bed80cb2f6,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid10e1c8,public
From: "Kenneth Soh @ BTM Singapore" <kensoh@pacific.net.sg>
Subject: RAID 1 or 5 ?
Date: 1999/07/25
Message-ID: <7nl85m$3nn$1@newton.pacific.net.sg>
X-Deja-AN: 505936135
Organization: Subscriber of Pacific Internet 
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.71.1712.3
Newsgroups: comp.arch.storage,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage,fido.ger.storage