Re: RAID 1 or 5 ?

Article View: comp.arch.storage

Article #438

#438

From: Ron Reaugh
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 1999 00:00

11 lines
1275 bytes

highend wrote in message <7nsoie$5g1$2@birch.prod.itd.earthlink.net>...

-snip

>RAID 5 would only support the loss of one drive at a time
>and i can't think of anything that would support the loss of "any"
>2 drives at once


Three drive RAID 1 or mirrored RAID5 arrays.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <7nt334$nfk$1@bgtnsc01.worldnet.att.net>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References:

<7nl85m$3nn$1@newton.pacific.net.sg> <37A02675.23233EB8@sni.de> <EF4B31908F2A7BAC.E7C81737A020640C.DF7A420979E4C82E@lp.airnews.net> <7nsoie$5g1$2@birch.prod.itd.earthlink.net>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10e1c8,813a29bed80cb2f6
X-Google-Attributes: gid10e1c8,public
X-Google-Thread: 1144af,813a29bed80cb2f6
X-Google-Attributes: gid1144af,public
X-Google-Thread: f4d7c,813a29bed80cb2f6
X-Google-Attributes: gidf4d7c,public
From: "Ron Reaugh" <Ron-Reaugh@worldnet.att.net>
Subject: Re: RAID 1 or 5 ?
Date: 1999/07/30
Message-ID: <7nt334$nfk$1@bgtnsc01.worldnet.att.net>
X-Deja-AN: 507105069
References: <7nl85m$3nn$1@newton.pacific.net.sg> <37A02675.23233EB8@sni.de> <EF4B31908F2A7BAC.E7C81737A020640C.DF7A420979E4C82E@lp.airnews.net> <7nsoie$5g1$2@birch.prod.itd.earthlink.net>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
X-Complaints-To: abuse@worldnet.att.net
X-Trace: bgtnsc01.worldnet.att.net 933367716 24052 12.73.99.173 (30 Jul 1999 20:48:36 GMT)
Organization: MBR International
NNTP-Posting-Date: 30 Jul 1999 20:48:36 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.arch.storage,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage,fido.ger.storage

Reply to Parent Message