Re: RAID 1 or 5 ?

Article View: comp.arch.storage

Article #440

#440

From: Supak Lailert
Date: Sun, 01 Aug 1999 00:00

13 lines
1276 bytes

highend@srmc.com (highend) writes:
>RAID 5 would only support the loss of one drive at a time
>and i can't think of anything that would support the loss of "any" 
>2 drives at once

3-way mirror? That would do.

Supak
--
--
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
   >> Supak Lailert -- spk@yipintsoi.com                              >>
  >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Technical Details

Message-ID: <rq8mjf4n280cq6@corp.supernews.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References:

<7nl85m$3nn$1@newton.pacific.net.sg> <37A02675.23233EB8@sni.de>       <EF4B31908F2A7BAC.E7C81737A020640C.DF7A420979E4C82E@lp.airnews.net> <7nsoie$5g1$2@birch.prod.itd.earthlink.net>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10e1c8,813a29bed80cb2f6
X-Google-Attributes: gid10e1c8,public
X-Google-Thread: 1144af,813a29bed80cb2f6
X-Google-Attributes: gid1144af,public
X-Google-Thread: f4d7c,813a29bed80cb2f6
X-Google-Attributes: gidf4d7c,public
From: lailert@slip.net (Supak Lailert)
Subject: Re: RAID 1 or 5 ?
Date: 1999/08/01
Message-ID: <rq8mjf4n280cq6@corp.supernews.com>
X-Deja-AN: 507610348
References: <7nl85m$3nn$1@newton.pacific.net.sg> <37A02675.23233EB8@sni.de>       <EF4B31908F2A7BAC.E7C81737A020640C.DF7A420979E4C82E@lp.airnews.net> <7nsoie$5g1$2@birch.prod.itd.earthlink.net>
Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com
Newsgroups: comp.arch.storage,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage,fido.ger.storage
X-Complaints-To: newsabuse@supernews.com

Reply to Parent Message