Re: RAID 1 or 5 ?

Article View: comp.arch.storage

Article #447

#447

From: TPoh
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 00:00

11 lines
1188 bytes

Is RAID-6 actually implemented?

I always thought that it's just a concept.

Isabelle Schmidt <flaven@t-online.de> wrote in message
news:37E1425E.9F4D1F3B@t-online.de...
> RAID-5 tolerates only one HD failture and no HD error!
>
> The RAID-level you are looking for is RAID-6, that means, you have two
> spares. A RAIS-6 Array can correct an HD error and can tolerant up to
> two defect HDs. These controllers are very expensive.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <7rt7dp$6uv$1@newton3.pacific.net.sg>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <7nl85m$3nn$1@newton.pacific.net.sg> <37E1425E.9F4D1F3B@t-online.de>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f4d7c,813a29bed80cb2f6
X-Google-Attributes: gidf4d7c,public
X-Google-Thread: 1144af,813a29bed80cb2f6
X-Google-Attributes: gid1144af,public
X-Google-Thread: 10e1c8,813a29bed80cb2f6
X-Google-Attributes: gid10e1c8,public
From: "TPoh" <fjw@pacific.net.sg>
Subject: Re: RAID 1 or 5 ?
Date: 1999/09/17
Message-ID: <7rt7dp$6uv$1@newton3.pacific.net.sg>
X-Deja-AN: 526277898
References: <7nl85m$3nn$1@newton.pacific.net.sg> <37E1425E.9F4D1F3B@t-online.de>
X-Priority: 3
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2918.2701
Organization: Subscriber of Pacific Internet 
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Newsgroups: comp.arch.storage,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage,fido.ger.storage

Reply to Parent Message