Article View: comp.arch.storage
Article #462Re: RAID 1 or 5 ?
From: Malcolm Weir
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 1999 00:00
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 1999 00:00
16 lines
1633 bytes
1633 bytes
On 23 Sep 1999 17:42:13 PDT, "Jim Pappe" <jim@dynamicnetworkfactory.com> caused to appear as if it was written: >with Raid 5 plus hot spare - 2 drive can fail .. >www.raidexpert.com No. One drive can fail, then the hot spare can resynch, then another drive can fail. You could make the same claim of any redundant configuration: in a mirrored environment you can lose (the right) half of your disks, allow a hot spare to resynch, and then lose another drive. >> How is RAID 0/1 more "available" than RAID 5? Malc.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<542917806621EB4D.D7790E09D8D6432A.6A6AFE0B3A514528@lp.airnews.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<7nl85m$3nn$1@newton.pacific.net.sg> <37E1425E.9F4D1F3B@t-online.de> <937569107.3977.0.nnrp-11.9e98b72c@news.demon.co.uk> <37e660eb.12904299@news.earthlink.net> <7sehd5$80a@journal.concentric.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10e1c8,813a29bed80cb2f6 X-Google-Attributes: gid10e1c8,public X-Google-Thread: 1144af,813a29bed80cb2f6 X-Google-Attributes: gid1144af,public X-Google-Thread: f4d7c,813a29bed80cb2f6 X-Google-Attributes: gidf4d7c,public From: malc@cwix.com (Malcolm Weir) Subject: Re: RAID 1 or 5 ? Date: 1999/09/24 Message-ID: <542917806621EB4D.D7790E09D8D6432A.6A6AFE0B3A514528@lp.airnews.net> X-Deja-AN: 529206774 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <7nl85m$3nn$1@newton.pacific.net.sg> <37E1425E.9F4D1F3B@t-online.de> <937569107.3977.0.nnrp-11.9e98b72c@news.demon.co.uk> <37e660eb.12904299@news.earthlink.net> <7sehd5$80a@journal.concentric.net> X-Orig-Message-ID: <37f0eed4.9812600@library.airnews.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii NNTP-Posting-Time: Fri Sep 24 16:40:20 1999 Organization: Little to None NNTP-Proxy-Relay: library2.airnews.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Abuse-Reports-To: abuse at airmail.net to report improper postings Newsgroups: comp.arch.storage,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage,fido.ger.storage