Article View: comp.arch.storage
Article #530Re: Dell server benchmarks are a FRAUD
From: Tom Scales
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2003 19:26
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2003 19:26
45 lines
3061 bytes
3061 bytes
You realize that everything you said is, well, wrong? I just bought a Dell 4550. Very nice machine. P4-2.66, CD-RW, etc. etc. You believe that you could assemble the SAME machine, with 640MB, for $US260. Oh, and you're going to offer me a warranty and post sale tech support which, in my personal experience, is still excellent? Onsite! Sure you are. Tom "Maxim S. Shatskih" <maxim@storagecraft.com> wrote in message news:b5id59$2pv4$2@gavrilo.mtu.ru... > > Dell is a cheap clone PC company. > > Cheap??? > > Buy Asus mobo (based on the same Intel chipset as Dell uses) and a > case, together with all other components - which are the same as Dell > uses - in nearest store and assemble the machine yourself or by > efforts of your IT deparment. This will turn out around 2-2.5 times > cheaper then Dell. > Other benefits are - better upgrade path, since all components are > standard and easily replaceable, and better compatibility (Dell is > known to have PCI problems). Repairing a failed machine (no case for > SOHO, but for around 100 desktops this starts to be important) - is > also easier - buy the new mobo in the same store and replace. > > Comparing to cars - Lexus is by far more expensive then Nissan Almera, > but it has _real world_ advantages over it. Not so with Dells, since > they are a combination of the same parts as the self-assembled > machine. > > > and the pathetic performance of their machines proves it. The only > thing > > more pathetic is their server service. "Dude, I think you'll have to > call > > Adaptec. We don't make the controller." > > So, the "customer support" benefit of brand-names - which they are > proud of - is null and void in case of Dell. > > Max > >
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<JM2fa.122456$Lh6.117832@fe08.atl2.webusenet.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!c03.atl99!news.webusenet.com!pc01.webusenet.com!fe08.atl2.webusenet.com.POSTED!not-for-mailReferences:
<jvwea.112011$JE5.63851@news2.central.cox.net> <b5id59$2pv4$2@gavrilo.mtu.ru>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fe411,864953a89c5191f6 X-Google-Attributes: gidfe411,public X-Google-Thread: 10e1c8,864953a89c5191f6 X-Google-Attributes: gid10e1c8,public X-Google-Thread: 10a33e,864953a89c5191f6 X-Google-Attributes: gid10a33e,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-03-22 11:27:19 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!c03.atl99!news.webusenet.com!pc01.webusenet.com!fe08.atl2.webusenet.com.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Tom Scales" <tomtoo@softhome.net> Newsgroups: comp.arch.storage,it.comp.hardware.storage,alt.sys.pc-clone.dell References: <jvwea.112011$JE5.63851@news2.central.cox.net> <b5id59$2pv4$2@gavrilo.mtu.ru> Subject: Re: Dell server benchmarks are a FRAUD Lines: 47 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1123 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1123 Message-ID: <JM2fa.122456$Lh6.117832@fe08.atl2.webusenet.com> X-Complaints-To: abuse@usenetserver.com X-Abuse-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly. NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2003 14:25:29 EST Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2003 14:26:09 -0500