🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.arch.storage
Article #530

Re: Dell server benchmarks are a FRAUD

#530
From: Tom Scales
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2003 19:26
45 lines
3061 bytes
You realize that everything you said is, well, wrong?

I just bought a Dell 4550.  Very nice machine.  P4-2.66, CD-RW, etc. etc.

You believe that you could assemble the SAME machine, with 640MB, for
$US260.  Oh, and you're going to offer me a warranty and post sale tech
support which, in my personal experience, is still excellent?  Onsite!

Sure you are.

Tom
"Maxim S. Shatskih" <maxim@storagecraft.com> wrote in message
news:b5id59$2pv4$2@gavrilo.mtu.ru...
> > Dell is a cheap clone PC company.
>
> Cheap???
>
> Buy Asus mobo (based on the same Intel chipset as Dell uses) and a
> case, together with all other components - which are the same as Dell
> uses - in nearest store and assemble the machine yourself or by
> efforts of your IT deparment. This will turn out around 2-2.5 times
> cheaper then Dell.
> Other benefits are - better upgrade path, since all components are
> standard and easily replaceable, and better compatibility (Dell is
> known to have PCI problems). Repairing a failed machine (no case for
> SOHO, but for around 100 desktops this starts to be important) - is
> also easier - buy the new mobo in the same store and replace.
>
> Comparing to cars - Lexus is by far more expensive then Nissan Almera,
> but it has _real world_ advantages over it. Not so with Dells, since
> they are a combination of the same parts as the self-assembled
> machine.
>
> > and the pathetic performance of their machines proves it. The only
> thing
> > more pathetic is their server service. "Dude, I think you'll have to
> call
> > Adaptec. We don't make the controller."
>
> So, the "customer support" benefit of brand-names - which they are
> proud of - is null and void in case of Dell.
>
>     Max
>
>
Technical Details
Message-ID: <JM2fa.122456$Lh6.117832@fe08.atl2.webusenet.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!c03.atl99!news.webusenet.com!pc01.webusenet.com!fe08.atl2.webusenet.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
References: <jvwea.112011$JE5.63851@news2.central.cox.net> <b5id59$2pv4$2@gavrilo.mtu.ru>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: fe411,864953a89c5191f6
X-Google-Attributes: gidfe411,public
X-Google-Thread: 10e1c8,864953a89c5191f6
X-Google-Attributes: gid10e1c8,public
X-Google-Thread: 10a33e,864953a89c5191f6
X-Google-Attributes: gid10a33e,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-03-22 11:27:19 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!c03.atl99!news.webusenet.com!pc01.webusenet.com!fe08.atl2.webusenet.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Tom Scales" <tomtoo@softhome.net>
Newsgroups: comp.arch.storage,it.comp.hardware.storage,alt.sys.pc-clone.dell
References: <jvwea.112011$JE5.63851@news2.central.cox.net> <b5id59$2pv4$2@gavrilo.mtu.ru>
Subject: Re: Dell server benchmarks are a FRAUD
Lines: 47
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1123
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1123
Message-ID: <JM2fa.122456$Lh6.117832@fe08.atl2.webusenet.com>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@usenetserver.com
X-Abuse-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2003 14:25:29 EST
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2003 14:26:09 -0500