🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Thread View: comp.arch.storage
1 messages
1 total messages Started by Tom Ploegmakers Fri, 09 Feb 1996 13:57
exabyte tape size according to dump
#340
Author: Tom Ploegmakers
Date: Fri, 09 Feb 1996 13:57
40 lines
1729 bytes
Is there anyone who can explain this:

We use an exabyte 8505 on sunos4.1.3.
We use (r)dump to make a backup with the following (conservative)
parameters from when we still had 8200's
	rdump bsdfu0 100 6000 50000 ....
Dump tells us:
	DUMP: estimated 3444210 blocks (1681.74MB) on 1.06 tape(s).
Why should it only store 1.6GB on a 2.3GB tape?

I go and check:

Sun advices the following parameters:
#    "8mm",  "bdsf   112  54000  6000   : 2.3G", # Exabyte 8200
#    "8mm2", "bdsf   112 108000  6000   : 5.2G", # Exabyte 8500 (double
density)
#    "8mm4", "bdsf   112 216000  6000   :10.4G", # Exabyte 8500-Compression

That is some 8% more space on the tape than we assumed.

Then i calculate:

54000 bpi * 6000 ft * 12 i/ft = 3888000000 bytes = 3.62 GB
(i do not know how much tapeloss i need to calculate for the interrecord gaps)

And because I want the backup done i do (it IS an 8505 right?):

	rdump bsdfu0 100 6000 100000 ... ...
	 ...
	DUMP: estimated 3448954 blocks (1684.06MB) on 0.82 tape(s).

So doubling the density increases the capacity by 30%??

What is going on, what am i missing??
I would think that i could get the numbers somewhat identical.
-- 

tom ploegmakers		NIKHEF-CT	(tom@nikhef.nl)	
			po.box 4395, 1009 AJ Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
			phone: -31 20 5922035
Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads