Article View: comp.arch
Article #10277Re: Compilers and efficiency
From: Guy Harris
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 1991 17:35
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 1991 17:35
7 lines
787 bytes
787 bytes
>If a hardware polynomial evaluation takes longer than an explicit loop, >it is not the fault of the instruction, but of the implementation. What if a hardware polynomial evaluation takes longer than an *unrolled* loop, with the zero-coefficient terms taken out? Or do you have an implementation in mind that takes zero cycles to skip the terms with zero coefficients?
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<7207@auspex.auspex.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!auspex!guyReferences:
<27fa3350.6bc2@petunia.CalPoly.EDU> <7117@auspex.auspex.com> <10095@mentor.cc.purdue.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!auspex!guy From: guy@auspex.auspex.com (Guy Harris) Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: Re: Compilers and efficiency Message-ID: <7207@auspex.auspex.com> Date: 16 Apr 91 17:35:34 GMT References: <27fa3350.6bc2@petunia.CalPoly.EDU> <7117@auspex.auspex.com> <10095@mentor.cc.purdue.edu> Organization: Auspex Systems, Santa Clara Lines: 7