🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.arch
Article #10554

Re: Compilers, architecture, and efficiency

#10554
From: Jim Patterson
Date: Thu, 02 May 1991 13:38
23 lines
1556 bytes
In article <WK=A6.G@xds13.ferranti.com> peter@ficc.ferranti.com (peter da silva) writes:
>If you want to specify a boolean operation on a float, do the following:
>
>	f * 2.0
>
>It's up to the compiler to determine if this multiplication by a constant
>two can be handled by incrementing the exponent or if you have to do a real
>floating multiply (say, for example, that it's m * e ^ 16).

The problem with this is that the compiler rarely has enough
information to determine if it's "safe" to just bump the exponent.
Therefore it's left with the choice of doing a number of runtime
checks (is f equal to zero? Is exponent already at upper limit?), or
just punting and generating the naive "multiply by 2.0" instruction.

I suspect most compilers will do the latter because it's ultimately
more important to get the right answer.

-- 
Jim Patterson                              Cognos Incorporated
UUCP:uunet!mitel!cunews!cognos!jimp        P.O. BOX 9707    
PHONE:(613)738-1440 x6112                  3755 Riverside Drive
                                           Ottawa, Ont  K1G 3Z4
Technical Details
Message-ID: <9596@cognos.UUCP>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!cunews!cognos!jimp
References: <1991Apr28.154603.8003@rice.edu> <1991Apr29.155945.29907@rice.edu> <41279@genrad.UUCP> <WK=A6.G@xds13.ferranti.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!cunews!cognos!jimp
From: jimp@cognos.UUCP (Jim Patterson)
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: Compilers, architecture, and efficiency
Message-ID: <9596@cognos.UUCP>
Date: 2 May 91 13:38:19 GMT
References: <1991Apr28.154603.8003@rice.edu> <1991Apr29.155945.29907@rice.edu> <41279@genrad.UUCP> <WK=A6.G@xds13.ferranti.com>
Reply-To: jimp@cognos.UUCP (Jim Patterson)
Organization: Cognos Inc., Ottawa, Canada
Lines: 23