Article View: comp.arch
Article #10742Re: Comparison of Alpha, MIPS and PA-RISC-
From: Phillip Morris - SE Vienna Va.
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 20:24
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 20:24
44 lines
2403 bytes
2403 bytes
In article 37C@dscomsa.desy.de, hallam@zeus02.desy.de (Phill Hallam-Baker) writes: > >Bugs they still need to fix:- > > 1) Online manual still designed with aim of minimizing disk space rather than >providing information. Try out Sun's Answerbook technology (will take up over 200MB of disk if you install the whole thing), with hyper-text links throughout, a great search facility, etc. > 2) No help facility. Almost every vendor now has a help viewer pop-up in their windows environment. For Suns, just hit the Help key (if you haven't disable it) while in Openwindows. > 3) No standardized user firendly shell. What's a user-friendly shell? There sure are plenty to choose from, take your pick from sh, csh, ksh, tcsh, bash, etc. > 4) Command qualifiers hard coded into applications making multilanguage >customization impossible. Take a look at Solaris 2.1 -- it has extensive I18N (internationalization) support at both the O/S and the programmer's levels. > 5) Requires expensive expert to have a chance of any security. Sun's CMW (shipping in volume as of 12/17/92) only needs a regular admin and a security officer (who is required for any secure facility anyhow), and is being evaluated for the DISA CMW (B2+ security). > 6) File system limited to sequential file, forcing applications to create their >own file system on top of the UNIX one, thus preventing any standardization or >application independent optimization. Almost every Unix implementation now has many optimizations built-in, such as write clustering, SCSI tag-queuing, etc. You can also create holey files. Striping (both via h/w and s/w) is abundantly available. What type of file I/O are you complaining about the lack of? >Phill Hallam-Baker -Phil Morris
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1h596lINNhuf@sixgun.East.Sun.COM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!darwin.sura.net!jvnc.net!yale.edu!qt.cs.utexas.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!news2me.EBay.Sun.COM!cronkite.Central.Sun.COM!sixgun.East.Sun.COM!chessie!pmorrisReferences:
<BzGn32.37C@dscomsa.desy.de>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!darwin.sura.net!jvnc.net!yale.edu!qt.cs.utexas.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!news2me.EBay.Sun.COM!cronkite.Central.Sun.COM!sixgun.East.Sun.COM!chessie!pmorris From: pmorris@chessie.East.Sun.COM (Phillip Morris - SE Vienna Va.) Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: Re: Comparison of Alpha, MIPS and PA-RISC- Date: 21 Dec 1992 20:24:53 GMT Organization: Sun Microsystems, Inc. Lines: 47 Distribution: world Message-ID: <1h596lINNhuf@sixgun.East.Sun.COM> References: <BzGn32.37C@dscomsa.desy.de> Reply-To: pmorris@chessie.East.Sun.COM NNTP-Posting-Host: chessie.east.sun.com