Article View: comp.arch
Article #10881Re: Superscalar vs. multiple CPUs ?
From: peter da silva
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1992 01:08
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1992 01:08
9 lines
1062 bytes
1062 bytes
A transputer-like multi-CPU chip would make a killer UNIX box! Use Synthesis-
type techniques to map read and write over a pipe into message passing over
the interprocessor channels, and then run your UNIX pipeline one process per
CPU.
--
%Peter da Silva/77487-5012 USA/+1 713 274 5180/Have you hugged your wolf today?
/L{lineto}def/C{curveto}def/F{0 562 moveto 180 576 324 648 396 736 C 432 736 L
482 670 518 634 612 612 C}def/G{setgray}def .75 G F 612 792 L 0 792 L fill 1 G
324 720 24 0 360 arc fill 0 G 3 setlinewidth F stroke showpage % "Peerless"
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<id.U7RV.EMB@ferranti.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!menudo.uh.edu!sugar!ficc!peterReferences:
<PCG.92Dec9154602@aberdb.aber.ac.uk> <1992Dec9.211737.23911@walter.cray.com> <Bz25n0.202@metaflow.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.arch,comp.sys.intel Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!menudo.uh.edu!sugar!ficc!peter From: peter@ferranti.com (peter da silva) Subject: Re: Superscalar vs. multiple CPUs ? Message-ID: <id.U7RV.EMB@ferranti.com> Keywords: software pipelining, VLIW, LIW, superscalar Organization: Xenix Support, FICC References: <PCG.92Dec9154602@aberdb.aber.ac.uk> <1992Dec9.211737.23911@walter.cray.com> <Bz25n0.202@metaflow.com> Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1992 01:08:02 GMT Lines: 9