🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.arch
Article #10967

Re: Lisp performance (on Sparc SS2, SS10-30, HP720)

#10967
From: Guy Harris
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 18:44
14 lines
1321 bytes
>From the SpecInt92 results, one should expect a performance increase
>of about a factor of 2 when switching from a SS2 to either s SS10-30
>or HP720. Unfortunately, on both machines turned out to but just
>30% faster than a SS2 when running our system (for which ps NEVER
>shows a resident set under 3-4 MB, not even on an 8MB machine).

Just out of curiosity, does the HP machine have a write-through or a
write-back cache?  I've seen some cases where cache-buster programs
run better on machines with a write-through cache than on machines with
a write-back cache; your LISP interpreter+application may be such a
program.  The SS2 has a write-through cache, and the SS10 has, I think, a
write-back data cache.  (The SS10-30's caches are, when combined,
smaller than the SS2's cache - 20K Icache + 16K Dcache, vs. 64K combined
cache; how large is the HP's cache?)
Technical Details
Message-ID: <15506@auspex-gw.auspex.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!auspex-gw!guy
References: <1e824rINNlpu@iraul1.ira.uka.de>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!auspex-gw!guy
From: guy@Auspex.COM (Guy Harris)
Newsgroups: comp.arch,comp.benchmarks
Subject: Re: Lisp performance (on Sparc SS2, SS10-30, HP720)
Message-ID: <15506@auspex-gw.auspex.com>
Date: 16 Nov 92 18:44:51 GMT
References: <1e824rINNlpu@iraul1.ira.uka.de>
Sender: news@auspex-gw.auspex.com
Followup-To: comp.arch
Organization: Auspex Systems, Santa Clara
Lines: 14
Nntp-Posting-Host: auspex.auspex.com