Article View: comp.arch
Article #11355Re: Def of a workstation (a lark)
From: Rob Young
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 1993 02:20
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 1993 02:20
54 lines
2752 bytes
2752 bytes
In <WAYNE.93Jan3184216@backbone.uucp>
wayne@backbone (Wayne Schlitt) writes:
>This is almost certain to cause a long string of definitions, and
>quite possible a flame war or two.
yeah
>* A workstation must run UNIX
> This is a favorite of the unix bigots. Of course, one of the
> founders of the workstation field was apollo and they didn't run unix.
This one is more than a little puzzling. VMS workstations don't
count? Sort of like a men's club? What if it comes with a POSIX
shell? Still doesn't count? What a drag. . .
>* Workstations must be multi-user
> Well, this is kind of part of being on a network. A lot of what
> goes into Novell is adding multi-user functions to DOS. This also
> makes OS/2 and WNT questionable. (That may be why I have heard it
^^^
> used as a requirement recently :-)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Exactly.
Earlier you wrote:
>What definition there is, has been defined more by the marking folks
>than by anyone else. There have been long discussions about what the
>There have been long discussions about what the difference between a mainframe
>and a minicomputer and a microcomputer are. What separates a PC from a
>workstation is much less well defined.
I agree with wayne's assertion that it is a marketing thing. Leads me to the
question: If you have a *PC* that outperforms most workstations (and also
can run Unix and jump through all your hoops above), does that make it a
workstation? Couldn't a company call something a PC when it is really a
workstation in PC clothing? Will DEC have a marketing *hammer* that says in
essense:
"Our PC outperforms most/all of your workstations."
Don't forget to date your checks correctly,
Rob
young@tattoo.cs.widener.edu
"Even the street fighters over at Sun are concerned when they look at what's
happening with Windows. They see the way the market works: The users are a
bunch of sheep, and Billy [Gates, Microsoft CEO] is the shepherd"
-- Maureen O'Gara
Unigram-X editor
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1i86t8INNc5b@cs.widener.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!rutgers!ub!dsinc!cs.widener.edu!cs.widener.edu!usenetReferences:
<1993Jan3.052930.27869@wam.umd.edu> <WAYNE.93Jan3184216@backbone.uucp>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!rutgers!ub!dsinc!cs.widener.edu!cs.widener.edu!usenet From: YOUNG@tattoo.cs.widener.edu (Rob Young) Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: Re: Def of a workstation (a lark) Message-ID: <1i86t8INNc5b@cs.widener.edu> Date: 4 Jan 93 02:20:24 GMT References: <1993Jan3.052930.27869@wam.umd.edu> <WAYNE.93Jan3184216@backbone.uucp> Organization: Widener News/Mail Gateway Lines: 54 NNTP-Posting-Host: tattoo.cs.widener.edu X-News-Reader: VMS NEWS 1.20 In-Reply-To: wayne@backbone.uucp's message of 4 Jan 93 00:42:16 GMT