🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.arch
Article #11355

Re: Def of a workstation (a lark)

#11355
From: Rob Young
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 1993 02:20
54 lines
2752 bytes
In <WAYNE.93Jan3184216@backbone.uucp>
   wayne@backbone (Wayne Schlitt) writes:

>This is almost certain to cause a long string of definitions, and
>quite possible a flame war or two.
	yeah

>* A workstation must run UNIX
>  This is a favorite of the unix bigots.  Of course, one of the
>  founders of the workstation field was apollo and they didn't run unix.

	This one is more than a little puzzling.  VMS workstations don't
	count?   Sort of like a men's club?  What if it comes with a POSIX
	shell?  Still doesn't count?  What a drag. . .

>* Workstations must be multi-user
>  Well, this is kind of part of being on a network.  A lot of what
>  goes into Novell is adding multi-user functions to DOS.  This also
>  makes OS/2 and WNT questionable.  (That may be why I have heard it
                                                  ^^^
>  used as a requirement recently :-)
          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
	Exactly.


	Earlier you wrote:

>What definition there is, has been defined more by the marking folks
>than by anyone else.  There have been long discussions about what the
>There have been long discussions about what the difference between a mainframe
>and a minicomputer and a microcomputer are.  What separates a PC from a
>workstation is much less well defined.

I agree with wayne's assertion that it is a marketing thing.  Leads me to the
question:  If you have a *PC* that outperforms most workstations (and also
can run Unix and jump through all your hoops above), does that make it a 
workstation?  Couldn't a company call something a PC when it is really a 
workstation in PC clothing?  Will DEC have a marketing *hammer* that says in 
essense:

             "Our PC outperforms most/all of your workstations."

		Don't forget to date your checks correctly,

				Rob


                                                     young@tattoo.cs.widener.edu
"Even the street fighters over at Sun are concerned when they look at what's
happening with Windows.  They see the way the market works: The users are a
bunch of sheep, and Billy [Gates, Microsoft CEO] is the shepherd"
						-- Maureen O'Gara
						   Unigram-X editor
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1i86t8INNc5b@cs.widener.edu>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!rutgers!ub!dsinc!cs.widener.edu!cs.widener.edu!usenet
References: <1993Jan3.052930.27869@wam.umd.edu> <WAYNE.93Jan3184216@backbone.uucp>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!rutgers!ub!dsinc!cs.widener.edu!cs.widener.edu!usenet
From: YOUNG@tattoo.cs.widener.edu (Rob Young)
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: Def of a workstation (a lark)
Message-ID: <1i86t8INNc5b@cs.widener.edu>
Date: 4 Jan 93 02:20:24 GMT
References: <1993Jan3.052930.27869@wam.umd.edu> <WAYNE.93Jan3184216@backbone.uucp>
Organization: Widener News/Mail Gateway
Lines: 54
NNTP-Posting-Host: tattoo.cs.widener.edu
X-News-Reader: VMS NEWS 1.20
In-Reply-To: wayne@backbone.uucp's message of 4 Jan 93 00:42:16 GMT