Article View: comp.arch
Article #11436Re: Registerless processor
From: Nathan Brookwood
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 22:17
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 22:17
15 lines
1201 bytes
1201 bytes
In article 11202, Theo de Raadt suggests that the registers in the PDP-11 were mapped onto memory, in the style of the PDP-10. This was not the case. These registers had bus addresses from which they could be interrogated for diagnostic purposes from the front panel, (in a day when machines still had physical lights and switches), but there was no practical way for programs to access these registers as anything but registers. And, yes, they were implemented as registers, and not as memory, as de Raadt implies. And no, you couldn't execute a program out of them. BTW, I believe the Univac 1100 Series (1105/1107/1108 et al) also mapped their registers onto the low order addresses in memory, a la the PDP-6 and PDP-10.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Nov23.221707.21356@clipper.ingr.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!unix!clipper!nathanbReferences:
<1992Nov13.181654.11692@fcom.cc.utah.edu> <BxxwAq.G8C@xrtll.uucp> <DERAADT.92Nov19231103@newt.newt.cuc.ab.ca>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!unix!clipper!nathanb From: nathanb@clipper.ingr.com (Nathan Brookwood) Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: Re: Registerless processor Message-ID: <1992Nov23.221707.21356@clipper.ingr.com> Date: 23 Nov 92 22:17:07 GMT References: <1992Nov13.181654.11692@fcom.cc.utah.edu> <BxxwAq.G8C@xrtll.uucp> <DERAADT.92Nov19231103@newt.newt.cuc.ab.ca> Organization: Intergraph Advanced Processor Division - Palo Alto, CA Lines: 15