🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.arch
Article #11436

Re: Registerless processor

#11436
From: Nathan Brookwood
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 22:17
15 lines
1201 bytes
In article 11202, Theo de Raadt suggests that the registers in the PDP-11
were mapped onto memory, in the style of the PDP-10.

This was not the case.  These registers had bus addresses from which they
could be interrogated for diagnostic purposes from the front panel, 
(in a day when machines still had physical lights and switches), but
there was no practical way for programs to access these registers as 
anything but registers.

And, yes, they were implemented as registers, and not as memory, as de Raadt
implies. And no, you couldn't execute a program out of them.

BTW, I believe the Univac 1100 Series (1105/1107/1108 et al) also mapped
their registers onto the low order addresses in memory, a la the PDP-6 and
PDP-10.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1992Nov23.221707.21356@clipper.ingr.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!unix!clipper!nathanb
References: <1992Nov13.181654.11692@fcom.cc.utah.edu> <BxxwAq.G8C@xrtll.uucp> <DERAADT.92Nov19231103@newt.newt.cuc.ab.ca>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!unix!clipper!nathanb
From: nathanb@clipper.ingr.com (Nathan Brookwood)
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: Registerless processor
Message-ID: <1992Nov23.221707.21356@clipper.ingr.com>
Date: 23 Nov 92 22:17:07 GMT
References: <1992Nov13.181654.11692@fcom.cc.utah.edu> <BxxwAq.G8C@xrtll.uucp> <DERAADT.92Nov19231103@newt.newt.cuc.ab.ca>
Organization: Intergraph Advanced Processor Division - Palo Alto, CA
Lines: 15