Re: New Moto chips (was Will NeXT survive?)

Article View: comp.arch

Article #11515

#11515

From: Guy Harris
Date: Sun, 12 May 1991 19:55

10 lines
779 bytes

>- 486SX - same as 486, but 16-bit external data paths and no FPU

You've obviously been confused by the "SX" in "486SX".  The 486SX has
32-bit external data paths, the "SX" nonwithstanding.

>I just don't understand the market for the 486SX (as it is really
>closer to a 386 than a 486).

I assume the market is "folks who don't need the FPU but want a faster
processor".

Technical Details

Message-ID: <7765@auspex.auspex.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!auspex!guy

References: <14720@encore.Encore.COM> <32580029@hpcuhe.cup.hp.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!auspex!guy
From: guy@auspex.auspex.com (Guy Harris)
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: New Moto chips (was Will NeXT survive?)
Message-ID: <7765@auspex.auspex.com>
Date: 12 May 91 19:55:48 GMT
References: <14720@encore.Encore.COM> <32580029@hpcuhe.cup.hp.com>
Organization: Auspex Systems, Santa Clara
Lines: 10

Reply to Parent Message