Article View: comp.arch
Article #11527Re: RISC vs. CISC -- SPECmarks
From: peter da silva
Date: Mon, 13 May 1991 12:16
Date: Mon, 13 May 1991 12:16
11 lines
954 bytes
954 bytes
In article <1991Apr27.012655.6508@rice.edu>, preston@ariel.rice.edu (Preston Briggs) writes: > peter@ficc.ferranti.com (peter da silva) writes: > >Ah, the old Von Neumann botleneck. Time to apply RISC design techniques to > >memory subsystems. > Well, you _could_ rediscover the Connection Machine. Is it reasonable to think about scaling the CM down to a desktop workstation? -- Peter da Silva; Ferranti International Controls Corporation; +1 713 274 5180; Sugar Land, TX 77487-5012; `-_-' "Have you hugged your wolf, today?"
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<_R9B1S2@xds13.ferranti.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!uupsi!ficc!peterReferences:
<1991Apr22.044553.16805@mp.cs.niu.edu> <1991Apr27.012655.6508@rice.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.arch Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!uupsi!ficc!peter From: peter@ficc.ferranti.com (peter da silva) Subject: Re: RISC vs. CISC -- SPECmarks Message-ID: <_R9B1S2@xds13.ferranti.com> Organization: Ferranti International Controls Corporation References: <1991Apr22.044553.16805@mp.cs.niu.edu> <1991Apr27.012655.6508@rice.edu> Date: Mon, 13 May 91 12:16:38 GMT