Article View: comp.arch
Article #11627Re: Anything wrong with the i860
From: Preston Briggs
Date: Thu, 16 May 1991 22:14
Date: Thu, 16 May 1991 22:14
20 lines
1356 bytes
1356 bytes
dank@blacks.jpl.nasa.gov (Dan Kegel) writes: >I just ran a stupid benchmark (the FFT from Numerical Recipies, length 1024, >2000 reps) on both a Sun 4/470 and an Alliant FX/2800. >Performance was within 10% of identical. >[Gee, everyone said the i860 was much faster than a Sun; >guess I misunderstood.] The i860 can smoke a Sparc, but it takes a smart (mostly non-existant) compiler and the right applications. A man at Alliant charactarized the 860 as having a small "sweet spot". In early experiments (meaning primitive compilers), we measured a factor of 21 improvement from (very tedious) hand coding and compiler results. Basically, really advanced architectures require really advanced compilers to get best results. For example, vector machines need vectorizing compilers. The i860 needs many of the same techniques. Preston Briggs
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1991May16.221437.10751@rice.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!rice!ariel.rice.edu!prestonReferences:
<3486@charon.cwi.nl> <3986@ssc-bee.ssc-vax.UUCP> <dank.674423728@blacks>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!rice!ariel.rice.edu!preston From: preston@ariel.rice.edu (Preston Briggs) Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: Re: Anything wrong with the i860 Message-ID: <1991May16.221437.10751@rice.edu> Date: 16 May 91 22:14:37 GMT References: <3486@charon.cwi.nl> <3986@ssc-bee.ssc-vax.UUCP> <dank.674423728@blacks> Sender: news@rice.edu (News) Organization: Rice University, Houston Lines: 20