🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.arch
Article #11653

Re: What's in the '586?

#11653
From: william E Davidsen
Date: Fri, 17 May 1991 17:55
20 lines
1355 bytes
In article <a3Li023807T001@JUTS.ccc.amdahl.com>, rbw00@ccc.amdahl.com ( 
213  Richard Wilmot) writes:

|> May we hope that the 586 will be SELF-VIRTUALIZABLE so that I can
run
|> multiple different operating systems concurrently.

  The best info I've heard (on 386users mailing list of course) is that
there will be two CPUs and one FPU, and the FPU will be shared when
needed. The story going around is that someone at Intel asked what the
best support for wandows would be: X or MS, and the answer was "a
second
CPU to run the damn window manager." It is not impossible that Intel
took this to heart.

  I'm also told that the SCO MPX extension to run multiple CPUs on UNIX
will run with this chip because it follows some set of rules for how
additional CPUs should appear.

  I also hear that the cache is up to 32k.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1991May17.135551@yeti.crd.GE.COM>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!crdgw1!yeti!davidsen
References: <1991May14.002130.4740@vax5.cit.cornell.edu> <a3Li023807T001@JUTS.ccc.amdahl.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!crdgw1!yeti!davidsen
From: davidsen@yeti.crd.GE.COM (william E Davidsen)
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: What's in the '586?
Message-ID: <1991May17.135551@yeti.crd.GE.COM>
Date: 17 May 91 17:55:51 GMT
References: <1991May14.002130.4740@vax5.cit.cornell.edu> <a3Li023807T001@JUTS.ccc.amdahl.com>
Sender: news@crdgw1.crd.ge.com
Reply-To: davidsen@crdos1.crd.ge.com
Distribution: comp
Organization: GE Corporate R&D Center, Schenectady NY
Lines: 20