Re: What's in the '586?

Article View: comp.arch

Article #11681

#11681

From: David Kessner
Date: Sun, 19 May 1991 07:27

7 lines
776 bytes

Hey!  Could be worse-- Intel could put OS/2 functions in 'microcode'!
I wonder if they will offer a 586sz, a 586 sans OS/2 and 8086 emulation. :):):)

-- 
David Kessner - david@kessner.denver.co.us            |
1135 Fairfax, Denver CO  80220  (303) 377-1801 (p.m.) | Reunite PANGEA!
Why can't everyone have three or four line .sig's?    |

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1991May19.072710.865@kessner.denver.co.us>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!caen!hellgate.utah.edu!csn!kessner!david

References: <1991May14.002130.4740@vax5.cit.cornell.edu> <42390@cup.portal.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!caen!hellgate.utah.edu!csn!kessner!david
From: david@kessner.denver.co.us (David Kessner)
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: What's in the '586?
Message-ID: <1991May19.072710.865@kessner.denver.co.us>
Date: 19 May 91 07:27:10 GMT
References: <1991May14.002130.4740@vax5.cit.cornell.edu> <42390@cup.portal.com>
Organization: Kessner, Inc.
Lines: 7

Reply to Parent Message