Re: IEEE arithmetic (Goldberg paper)

Article View: comp.arch

Article #12113

#12113

From: Malcolm Shute
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 1991 11:02

20 lines
1071 bytes

In article <9106070109.AA02137@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU> jbs@WATSON.IBM.COM writes:
>I think that if a (legal) program behaves differently when compiled with
>and without optimization that then the compiler is broken.  Perhaps you
>disagree.

      B = 5.0
      IF ( ( B .GT. 3.0 ) .OR. MYTEST(A) )
          PRINT some diagnotic messages


      LOGICAL FUNCTION MYTEST(X)
      REAL X
      MYTEST = some boolean work
      PRINT a few diagnostics on the screen
      RETURN
      END

--

Malcolm SHUTE.         (The AM Mollusc:   v_@_ )        Disclaimer: all

Technical Details

Message-ID: <2689@m1.cs.man.ac.uk>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!mcsun!ukc!mucs!mshute

References: <9106070109.AA02137@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!mcsun!ukc!mucs!mshute
From: mshute@cs.man.ac.uk (Malcolm Shute)
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: IEEE arithmetic (Goldberg paper)
Message-ID: <2689@m1.cs.man.ac.uk>
Date: 14 Jun 91 11:02:18 GMT
References: <9106070109.AA02137@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU>
Sender: news@cs.man.ac.uk
Reply-To: mshute@cs.man.ac.uk (Malcolm Shute)
Organization: Department of Computer Science, University of Manchester UK
Lines: 20

Reply to Parent Message