Article View: comp.arch
Article #12200Re: IEEE arithmetic (Goldberg paper)
From: Jon Krueger
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 1991 02:27
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 1991 02:27
12 lines
1014 bytes
1014 bytes
jbs@WATSON.IBM.COM writes: >I checked the behavior [of Malcom's code sample] with the IBM VS >Fortran and Xlf compilers. In both cases the behavior was not changed >by optimization ... So this example will not convince me that I'm wrong. I see. Therefore no standard FORTRAN compiler would be permitted to do any differently, right? These compilers define what is and is not a legal optimization, is that your assertion? -- Jon Jon Krueger, jpk@ingres.com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1991Jun20.022743.1474@ingres.Ingres.COM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!pacbell.com!pacbell!rtech!ingres!Ingres.COM!jpkReferences:
<9106190124.AA27410@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!pacbell.com!pacbell!rtech!ingres!Ingres.COM!jpk From: jpk@Ingres.COM (Jon Krueger) Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: Re: IEEE arithmetic (Goldberg paper) Message-ID: <1991Jun20.022743.1474@ingres.Ingres.COM> Date: 20 Jun 91 02:27:42 GMT References: <9106190124.AA27410@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU> Reply-To: jpk@Ingres.COM (Jon Krueger) Organization: Ingres Division, ASK Computer Systems. Lines: 12