Re: MFLOP for some old machines.

Article View: comp.arch

Article #12304

#12304

From: reijnierse p
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 11:46

39 lines
1671 bytes

In article <1993Jan20.225851.1@cc.curtin.edu.au> zrepachol@cc.curtin.edu.au writes:
>In article <1993Jan19.180916.19186@qucis.queensu.ca>, wong@qucis.queensu.ca (Tak Shing Wong) writes:
>> Hi, 
>> 	Please forgive me if the following question is already is
>> any FAQ. 
>> 	Can someone please tell me the performance for the
>> following machines in terms of MFLOP,
>> 1) uVax
>
>About .3. Hard to stick a good number on it, as many instruction are emulated.
>
>> 2)Sun3/75
>> 3)Vax 780
>
>1. give or take eta. If its SPEC, its is DEFINED to be 1
>
>> 4) Sun3/16/FPA
>> 5)Dec 8600
>
>3 or so. The numbers will differ from 3x a 780, acording to which instruction
>mix you use for the measurement.
>
>~Paul
>
If you mean Linpack MFLOPS the numbers are:

uVAX II      .13
SUN 3/50     .087 (with 68881 fp processor)
SUN 3/160    .10    "     "    "   "
VAX 780 FPA  .11
DEC 8600     .48

Piet Reijnierse

-- 
Piet Reijnierse                      Philips Research Laboratories
tel. +31 40 743972                   Building WYp room 4
fax  +31 40 744810                   Prof Holstlaan 4
email: reyniers@prl.philips.nl       5656AA Eindhoven

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1993Jan21.114635.11148@prl.philips.nl>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!sun4nl!relay.philips.nl!prle!reyniers

References: <1993Jan19.180916.19186@qucis.queensu.ca> <1993Jan20.225851.1@cc.curtin.edu.au>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: comp.arch
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!sun4nl!relay.philips.nl!prle!reyniers
From: reyniers@prl.philips.nl (reijnierse p)
Subject: Re: MFLOP for some old machines.
Message-ID: <1993Jan21.114635.11148@prl.philips.nl>
Sender: news@prl.philips.nl (USENET News System)
Organization: Philips Research Laboratories, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
References: <1993Jan19.180916.19186@qucis.queensu.ca> <1993Jan20.225851.1@cc.curtin.edu.au>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 11:46:35 GMT
Lines: 39

Reply to Parent Message