Article View: comp.arch
Article #12429Re: Def of a workstation (a lark)
From: william E Davidsen
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 1993 15:24
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 1993 15:24
51 lines
3364 bytes
3364 bytes
In article <1993Jan3.235327.13718@qb.rhein-main.de>, vhs@rhein-main.de (Volker Herminghaus-Shirai) writes:
| (Additional menu items for move, resize, etc that are useless if you have
| a mouse since no one in his sane mind would use them then.)
| The video-mode desaster is another example. I have yet to see a workstation
| that keeps switching between "text-mode" and a horrendous amount of
| "graphics-modes" (except for the RS6000, which does text/graphics mode. Sigh.
I have yet to see a non-accelerated workstation which did scrolling of
text windows as fast as a dedicated text mode. Since you are moving less
data with a hardware supported text mode it will always be faster,
unless you deliberately cripple the hardware to make a point.
I prefer to do long interractive editing (like writing articles and
books) on a text screen because of this. It definitely has uses.
| A decent workstation has IMHO *at least* the following items of which the
| software can and does take advantage of:
| a high-resolution screen
| a pointing device
| an ethernet connection (or token ring if your management was bribed ;-)
| a UN*X operating system with TCP/IP support and a C compiler
| a boot prom that allows for interactive diagnosis etc.
| a decent amount of RAM and hard disk space
| a tape drive for backups and data exchange as opposed to floppy disk
| other items I may have forgotten (it's already tomorrow...;-)
|
| Software writers are usually driven to write for the lowest reasonable
| common denominator, so if any of the above items don't exist in the base
| configuration of a workstation line, forget at least 50% of their usefulness
| if you have them. (E.g. >50 AIX or SCO UNIX installation disks vs. one tape.
| Newer releases may give you one or two floppies and a tape, but still no
| delivery on CD-ROM, as far as I see. Also no installing via ethernet, since
| not everybody has it, etc.)
Your "far as I can see" should get glasses. SCO has been shipping on
CD for years, and Dell has been supporting network install for several
years, too. For ease of install I would rate Dell first, then Sun and
SCO tied, and HP-UX down a good bit from that.
Sun beats SCO for ease of network setup, but that's because you can't
offer choices without having either menus or prompts. Installing a smart
net card on a Sun, like 4/670 for instance, a small server, is more
complex than adding a net card to SCO.
I can remember installing V7 on a PDP-11, and it startet with toggling
the boot so the paper tape could be read to boot the magnetic media...
we have made progress in the last few decades.
--
bill davidsen, GE Corp. R&D Center; Box 8; Schenectady NY 12345
Keyboard controller has been disabled, press F1 to continue.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1993Jan5.152453.13303@crd.ge.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!crdgw1!rdsunx.crd.ge.com!ariel!davidsenReferences:
<1993Jan3.052930.27869@wam.umd.edu> <1993Jan3.235327.13718@qb.rhein-main.de>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!crdgw1!rdsunx.crd.ge.com!ariel!davidsen From: davidsen@ariel.crd.GE.COM (william E Davidsen) Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: Re: Def of a workstation (a lark) Message-ID: <1993Jan5.152453.13303@crd.ge.com> Date: 5 Jan 93 15:24:53 GMT References: <1993Jan3.052930.27869@wam.umd.edu> <1993Jan3.235327.13718@qb.rhein-main.de> Sender: usenet@crd.ge.com (Required for NNTP) Reply-To: davidsen@crd.ge.com (bill davidsen) Organization: GE Corporate R&D Center, Schenectady NY Lines: 51 Nntp-Posting-Host: ariel.crd.ge.com