Article View: comp.arch
Article #12547Re: Def of a workstation (a lark)
From: Phill Hallam-Baker
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 23:12
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 23:12
59 lines
2935 bytes
2935 bytes
In article <1993Jan04.155544.18325@eng.umd.edu>, sysmgr@king.eng.umd.edu (Doug Mohney) writes: |>In article <1i5vdmINN3ek@cs.widener.edu>, YOUNG@tattoo.cs.widener.edu (Rob |>Young) writes: |>>In <1993Jan3.052930.27869@wam.umd.edu> rsrodger@wam.umd.edu writes: |>> |>>> At first I was tempted to talk about UNIX or RISC, but these |>>> were less than satisfactory (UNIX because he could be running |>>> UNIX, and RISC sounds deficient--those old M68k based Suns are |>>> still workstations...and then there's the 386i...).. |>>> |>>> Anyone? Come to think of it, it's pretty muddled to me, too. |>>> |>> |>>The bus. At least that is how DEC is differentiating their Alpha PC (yet |>>to debut) from their workstations. The PC will have the same chip (125 |>>MHz) as the yet to debut low-end workstation. The workstation is |>Turbochannel |>>based, the PC EISA. I think you will notice a big difference between the seriously nice PXG graphics on the TURBOchannel and the PC weanie version. |>Hm. Does this mean the HP Workstations, which use EISA, are really PeeCees |>in disguise? :-) Probably the reason for DEC marketing making the distinction. |>Actually, a "workstation" would have the following vague and fuzzy |>definitions, |>according to the book of Moo: |> |> A) One big f@#$ing screen, which is nearly as expensive as the CPU. |> Don't bother braggin' unless it's 17" or better. Lots of PCs seem to be appearing with the SONY Trinitron monitor, a niiccceee peice of kit. |> B) Designed to be seamless-ly intergrated into Internet and can run |> news. :-) PC's don't count here because you have to: |> 1) buy an Ethernet card |> 2) Add drivers to run TCP/IP Which throws out VMS again since TCP/IP is an add on, since Multinet etc started up DEC would have a lawsuit on their hands if they bundled UCX. Mind you ont thing that peeves me. Have you noticed all the pc portables that don't have an ethernet card? To get a portable Pc that plugs into the net I would have to by something costing almost as much as a workstation, Also the expansion boxes for those beasties are a rip off, most only seem to have two slots - after you have plugged in your ethernet card you have to chose between the frame grabber for dirty pickys, the SCSI bus interface, the hi res display card... -- Phill Hallam-Baker
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<C0pptL.BB7@dscomsa.desy.de>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!dxcern!dscomsa!zeus02.desy.de!hallamReferences:
<1993Jan3.052930.27869@wam.umd.edu>,<1i5vdmINN3ek@cs.widener.edu> <1993Jan04.155544.18325@eng.umd.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.arch Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!dxcern!dscomsa!zeus02.desy.de!hallam From: hallam@zeus02.desy.de (Phill Hallam-Baker) Subject: Re: Def of a workstation (a lark) Message-ID: <C0pptL.BB7@dscomsa.desy.de> Sender: usenet@dscomsa.desy.de (usenet) Reply-To: Hallam@zeus02.desy.de Organization: Deutsches Elektronen Synchrotron, Experiment ZEUS bei HERA References: <1993Jan3.052930.27869@wam.umd.edu>,<1i5vdmINN3ek@cs.widener.edu> <1993Jan04.155544.18325@eng.umd.edu> Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 23:12:50 GMT Lines: 59