🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <347@ames.UUCP> eugene@pioneer.UUCP (Eugene Miya N.) writes:
>SECOND more serious note: it is beginning to appear that the powers that
>be are putting a tighter and tighter grip on my multiprocessor
>bibliography.  It has not yet had a SENSITIVE classification put on it,
>but I think this is a matter of time.  What this means is that it might
>not be possible to distribute this outside the US anymore under penality
>of law.  This includes to Allies of the US like France and England.  All
>for a few bibliographic references whose titles are in the public
>domain.  I will try to clear the currently pending Foreign requests, and
>requests by International companies should best be done by your US
>offices.  But once that SENSITIVE label is placed on it, the penalities
>on me or anyone who transports it outside the US will be serious.

Two points...
A) Gee, that sounds interesting... I *would* like a copy what you've got.
   I thought it would be very dry, but with such a recommendation....
   (You may tell The Powers That Be that _The_Purloined_Letter_ might have
   been more successful.)
B) It strikes me as funny that the most accessible multiprocessing system
   currently available (and thus, may I suggest, one of the most promising)
   is the Transputer, which the U.S. Gov't can't do a damn thing about.

	-Colin Plumb (ccplumb@watnot.UUCP)

NSA CIA contras Iran bombing hostages gargoyle (<-- this is probably the code
                                                    name for *something*)