🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <784@ames.UUCP> lamaster@pioneer.UUCP (Hugh LaMaster) writes:
>In article <1310@ucbcad.berkeley.edu> faustus@ucbcad.berkeley.edu (Wayne A. Christopher) writes:
>:
>>
>>What we need to ask is, who will need more than ~1G of memory?  ...
>There could be other applications besides the often mentioned scientific
>and graphics programs which could potentially benefit from machines with
>larger address spaces.  Consider database applications, for example.
>...
>... What other applications  .. have people encountered that needed more 
> more than 1 GB?
Possible applications needing more than 1 GB:
o AI rule bases (close to a database)
o Text files (sometimes data for an AI application)
o Signal processing and image processing, including seismic.  I've heard that
one seismic series can be a semi trailer full of mag tapes.
o Interpretation of spectra from chemical analytic instruments.
o Dynamic system modeling, including weather forecasting, atmospheric dispersion
of hazardous materials (Chernobyl anyone?).
o Statistical analyses.

What would the net present value of "real" memory be if the "tape farms" and
"disk farms" could be replaced?  Allow for maintenance charges for electro-
mechanical equipment and operator time if the tape library is not automated.

Disclaimer:  I never have done seismic.  Any opinions are my own professional
thoughts and are not those of my employer.

Rob Lake
decvax!cwruecmp!nitrex!rbl
(cwruecmp soon to be domain-ized)