Re: 64 Vs 32

Article View: comp.arch

Article #13298

#13298

From: mac
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 1987 15:51

12 lines
1049 bytes

> >could put 100 or so 500M disk drives on it

> The (to me) unrealistic part of your retort was in assuming that the disk
> farm has long to live.

Probably not.

Many systems encourage the use of user-owned removeable disk packs, each of
which may have something like a megabyte of real data.  Think of tapes.

Such systems often wind up with dozens of drives, just to avoid frequent
mounting & dismounting of packs.  Think tape drives.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1336@uvacs.CS.VIRGINIA.EDU>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watnot!watmath!clyde!rutgers!brl-adm!seismo!mcnc!rti-sel!ge-rtp!edison!uvacs!mac

References: <3810013@nucsrl.UUCP> <28200016@ccvaxa> <731@xanth.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watnot!watmath!clyde!rutgers!brl-adm!seismo!mcnc!rti-sel!ge-rtp!edison!uvacs!mac
From: mac@uvacs.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: 64 Vs 32
Message-ID: <1336@uvacs.CS.VIRGINIA.EDU>
Date: Wed, 25-Mar-87 10:51:32 EST
Article-I.D.: uvacs.1336
Posted: Wed Mar 25 10:51:32 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 28-Mar-87 07:55:44 EST
References: <3810013@nucsrl.UUCP> <28200016@ccvaxa> <731@xanth.UUCP>
Organization: University of Virginia
Lines: 12
Keywords: digital videodisk, tertiary storage
Summary: disk farm

Reply to Parent Message