Re: unaligned accesses

Article View: comp.arch

Article #13656

#13656

From: franka
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1987 00:59

8 lines
993 bytes

In article <16038@amdcad.AMD.COM> bcase@amdcad.UUCP writes:
>Ok, I think maybe it *is* time to start the discussion of word-addressed
>vs. byte-addressed memory systems.  John Mashey, care to start us off?

While we're at it, lets talk about bit-addressed systems, too.

Frank Adams                           ihnp4!philabs!pwa-b!mmintl!franka
Ashton-Tate          52 Oakland Ave North         E. Hartford, CT 06108

Technical Details

Message-ID: <2106@mmintl.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!husc6!linus!philabs!pwa-b!mmintl!franka

References: <16038@amdcad.AMD.COM>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!husc6!linus!philabs!pwa-b!mmintl!franka
From: franka@mmintl.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: unaligned accesses
Message-ID: <2106@mmintl.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 14-Apr-87 19:59:30 EST
Article-I.D.: mmintl.2106
Posted: Tue Apr 14 19:59:30 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 18-Apr-87 03:29:50 EST
References: <16038@amdcad.AMD.COM>
Reply-To: franka@mmintl.UUCP (Frank Adams)
Organization: Multimate International, E. Hartford, CT
Lines: 9
Keywords: word alignment

Reply to Parent Message