Article View: comp.arch
Article #13753Re: Cloning the new IBMs without violating copyrights
From: Mike Farren
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 1987 10:32
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 1987 10:32
33 lines
2374 bytes
2374 bytes
To the best of my knowledge (incomplete, I admit), there are four factors
which impinge on the "clonability" of the new IBM PS/2 computers:
1. The new VGA graphics hardware. This is not unclonable, it will just
take a little time to get equivalent graphics adapters and monitors
out to the general market. Probably six months, max.
2. The new ABIOS/CBIOS code. Again, not unclonable (I've heard rumors
that say the first clone will appear in about a month!).
3. ESDI disk drives. Easily cloned, but nobody's doing it yet. Needs
new disk controllers, and fully efficient operation may depend on:
4. "Microchannel" bus architecture. This is probably what's going to make
the new machines stand alone for quite a while. A large part of the
superiority that the new machines offer is in this bus, which is much
more efficient than the older PC bus. That bus was, essentially, just
a direct tie to the processor address/data/control lines. The new bus
is much more sophisticated, with a considerable amount of support
circuitry, all of which IBM is bent on protecting. Patents galore have
been applied for, and an official IBM spokesman has said "If you're going
to try and copy us, you should know that IBM has a lot of money for
lawyer's fees." (Paraphrase)
So, not unclonable, but it'll take a while before the cloners can come up to
the performance standards and still keep the prices down.
--
----------------
"... if the church put in half the time on covetousness
Mike Farren that it does on lust, this would be a better world ..."
hoptoad!farren Garrison Keillor, "Lake Wobegon Days"
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<2033@hoptoad.uucp>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!rutgers!ames!ucbcad!ucbvax!decvax!decwrl!sun!hoptoad!farrenReferences:
<766@vaxwaller.UUCP> <662@edge.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!rutgers!ames!ucbcad!ucbvax!decvax!decwrl!sun!hoptoad!farren From: farren@hoptoad.uucp (Mike Farren) Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: Re: Cloning the new IBMs without violating copyrights Message-ID: <2033@hoptoad.uucp> Date: Wed, 22-Apr-87 05:32:17 EST Article-I.D.: hoptoad.2033 Posted: Wed Apr 22 05:32:17 1987 Date-Received: Fri, 24-Apr-87 01:16:37 EST References: <766@vaxwaller.UUCP> <662@edge.UUCP> Reply-To: farren@hoptoad.UUCP (Mike Farren) Organization: Nebula Consultants in San Francisco Lines: 33 Keywords: silicon compilers reverse engineering