Article View: comp.arch
Article #1679Re: DECSYSTEM 20
From: Spider Boardman
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 1989 22:17
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 1989 22:17
38 lines
2631 bytes
2631 bytes
In article <20767@cup.portal.com>, mmm@cup.portal.com (Mark Robert Thorson) writes [in part]... >With regard to the pdp-11 and the -10, I recall a puzzling fact from the >PDP-11 Peripherals Handbook. Out of a large collection of peripheral products >there was one which did not have "11" in its name. This was the DL10 >Unibus window. The DL10 was used to map the memory of the PDP-11 for use as communications gear. The DECsystem-10 could examine and deposit anywhere in -11 memory, and it could also play with the -11's front panel through the DL10. The -10 could also allow the -11 to talk back to it. This was done by assigning a part of the -10's memory to appear in the -11's address space. The assigned locations could use the byte logic of the -10 to write to multiple addresses (or at least bytes) in the -10's memory each time the -11 referenced them. In fact, this was part of the startup protocol for the nodes. One of the first things they did when they came on line was to tell the -10 what software they were running. The DTE20 later 'replaced' the DL10. It was simpler to maintain in the field, and was much smaller. I made up for this by being slower (at least for networking applications). The DTE20 is used by the console front-end (or master -11) to load, dump, and diagnose the -10. This is its only real functional advantage over the DL10. The DL10 almost never broke, but when it did there were few people who ever wanted to try and fix it. Its complexity made it hard to debug the logic. Actually, I know of at least one DL10 still in service at a current customer site. This customer has (so far) kept it because of its bandwidth advantage for its networking. Bias warning: My duties at DEC include maintaining the native TOPS-10 network software (ANF-10). Our nodes will run fine through DTE20s, but they'd still much rather be running through DL10s. Other people might not be so supportive of the DL10. Spider Boardman UUCP: ...!decwrl!qarry.enet.dec.com!spider 200 Forest St., MRO1-2/L14 ARPA: spider%qarry.enet.dec.com@decwrl.dec.com Marlboro MA 01752-9101 Domains: spider@qarry.enet.dec.com I just work here. I don't speak for DEC, and vice versa.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<379@ryn.esg.dec.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uflorida!haven!decuac!shlump.nac.dec.com!ryn.esg.dec.com!qarry.enet.dec.comShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uflorida!haven!decuac!shlump.nac.dec.com!ryn.esg.dec.com!qarry.enet.dec.com From: spider@qarry.enet.dec.com (Spider Boardman) Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: Re: DECSYSTEM 20 Message-ID: <379@ryn.esg.dec.com> Date: 27 Jul 89 22:17:21 GMT Sender: guest@ryn.esg.dec.com Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation Lines: 38