🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.arch
Article #1687

Re: CISC Microprocessors

#1687
From: Michael Z Slater
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 1989 00:48
7 lines
806 bytes
>Well, it depends on what you want to call a CISC microprocessor.  The 680x0,
>80x86, NS32xxx, WE32x00, NEC V series, and Transputers are all microcoded.

Not quite. The V33 is a non-microcoded implementation, to provide additional
performance and (perhaps) to avoid the microcode copyright issues.

Michael Slater, Microprocessor Report   mslater@cup.portal.com  415/494-2677
Technical Details
Message-ID: <20806@cup.portal.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!wuarchive!wugate!uunet!portal!cup.portal.com!mslater
References: <405@ctycal.UUCP> <3098@scolex.sco.COM>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!wuarchive!wugate!uunet!portal!cup.portal.com!mslater
From: mslater@cup.portal.com (Michael Z Slater)
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: CISC Microprocessors
Message-ID: <20806@cup.portal.com>
Date: 28 Jul 89 00:48:34 GMT
References: <405@ctycal.UUCP> <3098@scolex.sco.COM>
Organization: The Portal System (TM)
Lines: 7