Re: CISC Microprocessors

Article View: comp.arch

Article #1696

#1696

From: dk smith... in full-dispersion m...
Date: Sat, 29 Jul 1989 05:12

19 lines
974 bytes

In a recent posting I referred to a book by Anceau that 
discussed different implementations of the 6502.

Well, low and behold, I wuz wrong!

Two seconds after my post I realized the study was
on the 6800.

Guess I was too eagar to help... I'll think first
next time :-)

Anyway, this mistake does not take anything away
from Anceau's book.  It will be interesting to some...



dk
---------------------------------------------------------

Technical Details

Message-ID: <118523@sun.Eng.Sun.COM>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!newstop!sun!decay!dks

References: <405@ctycal.UUCP> <3098@scolex.sco.COM> <486@lexicon.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!newstop!sun!decay!dks
From: dks%decay@Sun.COM (dk smith... in full-dispersion mode)
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: CISC Microprocessors
Keywords: 6502 blunder!!!!!!
Message-ID: <118523@sun.Eng.Sun.COM>
Date: 29 Jul 89 05:12:05 GMT
References: <405@ctycal.UUCP> <3098@scolex.sco.COM> <486@lexicon.com>
Sender: news@sun.Eng.Sun.COM
Reply-To: dks@sun.UUCP (dk smith... in full-dispersion mode)
Organization: Sun Microsystems, Mountain View
Lines: 19

Reply to Parent Message