Article View: comp.arch
Article #1752Re: Claimed bug in 80286
From: Michael O'Donnell x2915
Date: Fri, 04 Aug 1989 18:15
Date: Fri, 04 Aug 1989 18:15
29 lines
1787 bytes
1787 bytes
I was working at another company back in 1984 and if it wasn't us that
brought this problem to Intel's attention, I'm fairly certain we were the
first non-Intel folks to know about it. I'd have to go back and look at
my notes for details, but it involved the NMI and INTR signals. I seem to
recall that there is(was?) a window of time during the NMI acknowledgement
phase where, if INTR wiggles it is not noticed and gets lost. Or maybe
it's the other way around. Anyway, Intel provided a very simple (two
gates) circuit diagram as a hardware fix and also some suggestions for
software fixes, both of which seemed to do the trick. I don't know if the
later steppings of the 80286 incorporate a real fix, but I presume that
they do.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Michael O'Donnell
Porting and Peripherals (508)392-2915 home(508)937-0790
___________
/ ________/__ ...!{harvard,uunet,petsd}!masscomp!mod
/__/_______/ / mod@westford.ccur.com
Concurrent /__________/
Computer Corporation 1 Technology Way
Westford, MA 01886
DISCLAIMER: My opinions only coincidentally resemble those of my employer.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1781@masscomp.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ulowell!masscomp!modShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ulowell!masscomp!mod From: mod@masscomp.UUCP (Michael O'Donnell x2915) Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: Re: Claimed bug in 80286 Summary: It's true Message-ID: <1781@masscomp.UUCP> Date: 4 Aug 89 18:15:10 GMT Reply-To: mod@velcro.UUCP (Michael O'Donnell (508)392-2915) Organization: Concurrent Computer Corporation - Westford, MA Lines: 29