🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.arch
Article #1999

Re: IPI-2 vs. SCSI

#1999
From: Bruce Robertson
Date: Sat, 26 Aug 1989 00:57
16 lines
1300 bytes
In article <564@celit.UUCP> hutch@celerity.uucp (Jim Hutchison) writes:
   I'm a bit puzzled
   by the wide (32bit) and fast SCSIs.  They will probably kill the SCSI
   market by confusing people.  I personally would get miffed if I got
   a wide/fast interface and the *wrong* kind of SCSI disk.

I may be remembering this wrong (no reference material handy), but I
believe that SCSI/2 allows both the target and the initiator to
negotiate the width of the transfer down from 32 bits.  Therefore, you
can still use a 32-bit SCSI/2 device with an 8-bit SCSI controller,
and an 8-bit SCSI device with a 32-bit SCSI/2 controller.
-- 
	Bruce Robertson
	Hundred Acre Software, Reno, NV
	Domain: bruce@pooh.com
	UUCP:   ...!uunet!tahoe.unr.edu!heather!bruce
Technical Details
Message-ID: <BRUCE.89Aug25175741@heather.pooh.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!apple!tahoe!heather!bruce
References: <13698@polyslo.CalPoly.EDU> <564@celit.UUCP>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!apple!tahoe!heather!bruce
From: bruce@heather.pooh.com (Bruce Robertson)
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: IPI-2 vs. SCSI
Message-ID: <BRUCE.89Aug25175741@heather.pooh.com>
Date: 26 Aug 89 00:57:49 GMT
References: <13698@polyslo.CalPoly.EDU> <564@celit.UUCP>
Sender: bruce@pooh.com (Bruce Robertson)
Organization: Hundred Acre Software, Reno, NV
Lines: 16
In-reply-to: hutch@celerity.uucp's message of 22 Aug 89 19:33:30 GMT