🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <728@vector.UUCP> chip@vector.UUCP (Chip Rosenthal) writes:
>So, you can discuss the issue of uP's from a viewpoint of design and
>architectural dominance, which is probably the issue of greatest interest
>to readers here.  However, process dominance can lead to ownership of the
>merchant uP and controller market, and these "less interesting" processors
>are the bread and butter which fuel R&D on advanced processors.
>
>This is what makes the recent Intel/NEC copyright decision so interesting.
>-- 
>Chip Rosenthal     chip@vector.UUCP    |      Choke me in the shallow water
>Dallas Semiconductor   214-450-5337    |         before I get too deep.

I seemed to have missed something here (*(^%& course work load :-);
what _was_ the Intel/NEC decision result?  I've seen several posters
refer to it in passing in the last few days, but no discussion of the
actual result.

Crispin
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Login name:	sccowan			In real life: S. Crispin Cowan
Office:		DC3548	x3934		Home phone: 888-6375
Post Awful:	280 Phillip St., Apt. B1-15 Waterloo, N2L 3X1
UUCP:		watmath!watmsg!sccowan
Domain:		sccowan@watmsg.waterloo.edu

"Home is where your munchies are."
				-me