🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <26595@winchester.mips.COM> mash@mips.COM (John Mashey) writes:
 >In article <1989Aug30.152155.9613@mentor.com> plogan@mentor.com (Patrick Logan) writes:
 >>In article <1989Aug26.232710.27174@utzoo.uucp> henry@utzoo.uucp (Henry Spencer) writes:
 >>>Take a look at the history of Lisp on Lisp machines, whose time has come
 >>>*and gone* -- those awful "C-only" RISC machines run Lisp faster than the
 >>>custom-cooked Lisp machines do.
 >>Saying that C machines run Lisp faster than Lisp machines is
 >>simplistic.
 >There are many good ideas in LISP, and more of it will filter over.

Just a short I-just-want-to-know question: is it true that the DEC-10 systems
processors were designed for an efficient Lisp implementation, and was it 
efficient ? (I once heard someone state that these processors were made with
two high-level languages as aims, one of which was Lisp, and the other I forgot
(I guess it must be FORTRAN isn't it ?)).
--
Dolf Grunbauer          Tel: +31 55 432764  Internet dolf@idca.tds.philips.nl
Philips Telecommunication and Data Systems  UUCP ....!mcvax!philapd!dolf
Dept. SSP, P.O. Box 245, 7300 AE Apeldoorn, The Netherlands
-- 
Dolf Grunbauer          Tel: +31 55 432764  Internet dolf@idca.tds.philips.nl
Philips Telecommunication and Data Systems  UUCP ....!mcvax!philapd!dolf
Dept. SSP, P.O. Box 245, 7300 AE Apeldoorn, The Netherlands