Article View: comp.arch
Article #20925Re: Bandwidth and RISC vs. CISC
From: John McCalpin
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 1989 11:51
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 1989 11:51
25 lines
1647 bytes
1647 bytes
In article <1262@l.cc.purdue.edu> cik@l.cc.purdue.edu (Herman Rubin) writes:
>Another example is floating point arithmetic. The RISCy CRAY, on problems
>with rigid vectors, will run rings around the CYBER 205 in single precision
>floating point (around 14 digits). If we now change to double precision,
>we not get a time factor of about 15 in favor of the CYBER. Many problems
>in which non-rigid vectors are appropriate also favor the CYBER.
>Herman Rubin, Dept. of Statistics,hrubin@l.cc.purdue.edu
(1) What is a "rigid vector"?
(2) On 64-bit vector operations with long vectors, the Crays do not
"run rings around" the Cyber 205. The asymptotic speeds (MFLOPS) are:
Cray-1 Cyber 205 Cray X/MP
160 200 235
(3) Both the X/MP and 205 perform "double precision" (128-bit) arithmetic
in software, and experience a slow-down of close to a factor of 100
relative to 64-bit vector operations.
--
---------------------- John D. McCalpin ------------------------
Dept of Oceanography & Supercomputer Computations Research Institute
mccalpin@masig1.ocean.fsu.edu mccalpin@nu.cs.fsu.edu
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<632@loligo.cc.fsu.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!purdue!gatech!prism!loligo!mccalpinReferences:
<1262@l.cc.purdue.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!purdue!gatech!prism!loligo!mccalpin From: mccalpin@loligo.cc.fsu.edu (John McCalpin) Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: Re: Bandwidth and RISC vs. CISC Message-ID: <632@loligo.cc.fsu.edu> Date: 28 Apr 89 11:51:01 GMT References: <1262@l.cc.purdue.edu> Reply-To: mccalpin@loligo.cc.fsu.edu (John McCalpin) Organization: Supercomputer Computations Research Institute Lines: 25