🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.arch
Article #20939

Re: 80486 vs. 68040 code size

#20939
From: Norman Matloff
Date: Sat, 29 Apr 1989 00:34
13 lines
1047 bytes
In article <13699@steinmetz.ge.com> davidsen@crdos1.UUCP (bill davidsen) writes:

>  Someone posted an opinion that images on the 68040 will be smaller
>than the 80386. I didn't think this sounded right, so I made a few
>measurements. 

Everything else being equal, a machine with a more orthogonal 
structure  -- many op codes can be used with addressing modes
and many registers  --  should produce larger programs.  Thus the
68000 family machines, being more orthogonal than those in the
8086 family, should produce larger code, as shown by your data.

   Norm
Technical Details
Message-ID: <23757@agate.BERKELEY.EDU>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!agate!tinman.Berkeley.EDU!matloff
References: <13699@steinmetz.ge.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!agate!tinman.Berkeley.EDU!matloff
From: matloff@tinman.Berkeley.EDU (Norman Matloff)
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: 80486 vs. 68040 code size
Message-ID: <23757@agate.BERKELEY.EDU>
Date: 29 Apr 89 00:34:32 GMT
References: <13699@steinmetz.ge.com>
Sender: usenet@agate.BERKELEY.EDU
Reply-To: matloff@heather.ucdavis.edu (Norm Matloff)
Organization: EECS, UC Davis
Lines: 13