Re: 80486 vs. 68040 code size

Article View: comp.arch

Article #20995

#20995

From: Chip Rosenthal
Date: Tue, 02 May 1989 14:29

7 lines
774 bytes

pb@idca.tds.PHILIPS.nl (Peter Brouwer) writes:
>Is microsoft delivering a c compiler for unix/xenix?

The C compiler for XENIX *is* Microsoft C.  (asm for XENIX is masm, which
creates horrible problems for gcc, I'm told.)
-- 
Chip Rosenthal / chip@vector.Dallas.TX.US / Dallas Semiconductor / 214-450-5337

Technical Details

Message-ID: <111@vector.Dallas.TX.US>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ames!sun-barr!male!pitstop!texsun!pollux!killer!vector!chip

References: <13699@steinmetz.ge.com> <403@ssp2.idca.tds.philips.nl>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ames!sun-barr!male!pitstop!texsun!pollux!killer!vector!chip
From: chip@vector.Dallas.TX.US (Chip Rosenthal)
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: 80486 vs. 68040 code size
Message-ID: <111@vector.Dallas.TX.US>
Date: 2 May 89 14:29:21 GMT
References: <13699@steinmetz.ge.com> <403@ssp2.idca.tds.philips.nl>
Reply-To: chip@vector.Dallas.TX.US (Chip Rosenthal)
Organization: Dallas Semiconductor
Lines: 7

Reply to Parent Message