🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <902@aber-cs.UUCP> pcg@cs.aber.ac.uk (Piercarlo Grandi) writes:
|In article <13718@steinmetz.ge.com> davidsen@crdos1.UUCP (bill davidsen) writes:
|    
|      This totally mystifies me. Did someone bring in some MS-DOS figures?
|    My figures were clearly for Xenix, and I clearly stated the versions and
|    stuff (I think the info was quoted and appears above).
|
|But the comparisons you made may still be apple vs. oranges... I have the
|strong suspicion that you compared executable sizes, which tipically include

  The conditions I used were stated in the original posting in great
detail. I leave it to the reader to decide the value of the results
posted, but I clearly didn't try to compare MS-DOS and SunOS as the
poster implied. I used the best 386 and best 68k compiler to which I
have access, and made no claims or deductions from the results.

  Everything I have seen indicates that you are correct in assuming
5-10% smaller code (text segment) for the 386 *using compilers available
to me*.