Article View: comp.arch
Article #21029Re: The IPI fast peripheral interface
From: aglew
Date: Wed, 03 May 1989 18:58
Date: Wed, 03 May 1989 18:58
13 lines
922 bytes
922 bytes
>> Lately, SCSI has been pooping out, and IPI has been picking up steam >> again. > >How well does IPI perform when compared to synchronous SCSI? I have no data of my own to give, so I can't say. And I'm not sure that pasting together the tables in the magazines is appropriate. However, as I understand it, IPI is a bit more intelligent, allows more useful channel programs, than SCSI - even SCSI-2. But I haven't checked out SCSI-2 much.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<28200306@mcdurb>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!unmvax!deimos.cis.ksu.edu!uxc!uxc.cso.uiuc.edu!mcdurb!aglewReferences:
<12478@reed.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!unmvax!deimos.cis.ksu.edu!uxc!uxc.cso.uiuc.edu!mcdurb!aglew From: aglew@mcdurb.Urbana.Gould.COM Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: Re: The IPI fast peripheral interface Message-ID: <28200306@mcdurb> Date: 3 May 89 18:58:00 GMT References: <12478@reed.UUCP> Lines: 13 Nf-ID: #R:reed.UUCP:12478:mcdurb:28200306:000:447 Nf-From: mcdurb.Urbana.Gould.COM!aglew May 3 13:58:00 1989