Article View: comp.arch
Article #21098Re: Bandwidth and RISC vs. CISCOM
From: Jon Zeeff
Date: Sun, 07 May 1989 19:17
Date: Sun, 07 May 1989 19:17
21 lines
1460 bytes
1460 bytes
I don't see that much difference between WISC and a RISC chip and it's cache. In both cases, you are eliminating the external memory accesses necessary to execute some common code sequence. On the WISC chip, you have to set it up explicitly and invoke it with an instruction. On the RISC/cache machine, it's automatic and invoked by the address being reused (meaning that it's going to have to be a subroutine if the code sequence is to be used from many different places in your code). Perhaps we need (or does it already exist) some instructions to control caching. Something like "I'm about to execute some code that I know will be executed alot - keep it in the cache longer than usual" and "don't waste cache space on this - I'm only doing it once". Disclaimer - I just use CPUs. -- Jon Zeeff zeeff@b-tech.ann-arbor.mi.us Ann Arbor, MI sharkey!b-tech!zeeff
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<9322@b-tech.ann-arbor.mi.us>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!b-tech!zeeffReferences:
<38853@bbn.COM> <423@bnr-fos.UUCP> <288@ctycal.UUCP> <1262@l.cc.purdue.edu> <231@celit.UUCP> <10544@cit-vax.Caltech.Edu> <102714@sun.Eng.Sun.COM> <17932@cup.portal.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!b-tech!zeeff From: zeeff@b-tech.ann-arbor.mi.us (Jon Zeeff) Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: Re: Bandwidth and RISC vs. CISCOM Message-ID: <9322@b-tech.ann-arbor.mi.us> Date: 7 May 89 19:17:52 GMT References: <38853@bbn.COM> <423@bnr-fos.UUCP> <288@ctycal.UUCP> <1262@l.cc.purdue.edu> <231@celit.UUCP> <10544@cit-vax.Caltech.Edu> <102714@sun.Eng.Sun.COM> <17932@cup.portal.com> Reply-To: zeeff@b-tech.ann-arbor.mi.us (Jon Zeeff) Organization: Branch Technology Ann Arbor, MI Lines: 21