Article View: comp.arch
Article #21114Re: Criteria for comparing RISC processors
From: Les Milash
Date: Mon, 08 May 1989 16:42
Date: Mon, 08 May 1989 16:42
16 lines
1177 bytes
1177 bytes
In article <165@dg.dg.com> mpogue@dg.UUCP (Mike Pogue) writes: > > Some interesting points. However, Sun (of all the vendors) has >the BIGGEST problem with vendor-to-vendor compatibility. i'm not sure; they get a markup on all those disks we bought to hold all those binaries :) :)... on the other hand the sun 3's think sparc executables are scripts, and blow chunks when they try to run them. this has always amazed me, considering how together sun sw is in most other respects. actually i must say that i love this network of suns; it's as de luxe a pile of hardware as i've ever used. >My opinions are my own.... my comments are just a snotty retort, not even an opinion.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<423@unicads.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ncar!boulder!unicads!lesReferences:
<2368@ogccse.ogc.edu> <1464@cfa.cfa.harvard.EDU> <141@dg.dg.com> <156@dg.dg.com> <658@pitstop.West.Sun.COM> <165@dg.dg.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ncar!boulder!unicads!les From: les@unicads.UUCP (Les Milash) Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: Re: Criteria for comparing RISC processors Message-ID: <423@unicads.UUCP> Date: 8 May 89 16:42:49 GMT References: <2368@ogccse.ogc.edu> <1464@cfa.cfa.harvard.EDU> <141@dg.dg.com> <156@dg.dg.com> <658@pitstop.West.Sun.COM> <165@dg.dg.com> Reply-To: les@unicads.UUCP (Les Milash) Organization: Unicad Boulder, CO Lines: 16