Article View: comp.arch
Article #21146Re: Voting period concluded for comp.realtime
From: karl lehenbauer
Date: Tue, 09 May 1989 23:06
Date: Tue, 09 May 1989 23:06
19 lines
1215 bytes
1215 bytes
In article <76700066@p.cs.uiuc.edu>, gillies@p.cs.uiuc.edu writes: > I want to restate my view: I think this is a bad idea. And I work on > scheduling for real-time systems. Noted. Again. > According to the above criteria, you have no good reason to create the > new discussion group. If there really is a high level of interest, > why don't we see heavy discussion about real systems in comp.os.research, > comp.theory, or other newsgroups? You've said this in postings twice now, plus twice in email, plus you voted twice. The 170 people who voted *for* the group seemed to think it was a good idea. Come check in on us in a few weeks and see how we're doing. -- -- uunet!ficc!karl "Contemptuous lights flashed across the computer's -- karl@ficc.uu.net console." -- Hitchhiker's Guide
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4128@ficc.uu.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!csd4.milw.wisc.edu!lll-winken!uunet!ficc!karlReferences:
<3954@ficc.uu.net> <76700066@p.cs.uiuc.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!csd4.milw.wisc.edu!lll-winken!uunet!ficc!karl From: karl@ficc.uu.net (karl lehenbauer) Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: Re: Voting period concluded for comp.realtime Message-ID: <4128@ficc.uu.net> Date: 9 May 89 23:06:46 GMT References: <3954@ficc.uu.net> <76700066@p.cs.uiuc.edu> Organization: Ferranti International Controls Lines: 19