🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.arch
Article #21172

Re: Register usage [was Re: 80486 vs. 68040 code size]

#21172
From: grunwald
Date: Thu, 11 May 1989 02:57
9 lines
828 bytes
you neglect to mention that PCC is/was an antiquated compiler; a more
meaningful measure would be to look at e.g., `gcc' which does better
register allocation, CSE and code hoisting. How much do these affect
register usage?
--
Dirk Grunwald
Univ. of Illinois
grunwald@flute.cs.uiuc.edu
Technical Details
Message-ID: <GRUNWALD.89May10215733@flute.cs.uiuc.edu>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!iuvax!uxc!garcon!garcon.cso.uiuc.edu!grunwald
References: <921@aber-cs.UUCP>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!iuvax!uxc!garcon!garcon.cso.uiuc.edu!grunwald
From: grunwald@flute.cs.uiuc.edu
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: Register usage [was Re: 80486 vs. 68040 code size]
Message-ID: <GRUNWALD.89May10215733@flute.cs.uiuc.edu>
Date: 11 May 89 02:57:33 GMT
References: <921@aber-cs.UUCP>
Sender: news@garcon.cso.uiuc.edu
Distribution: eunet,world
Organization: University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
Lines: 9
In-reply-to: pcg@aber-cs.UUCP's message of 9 May 89 13:58:56 GMT