Sub groups ?

Article View: comp.arch

Article #21197

#21197

From: 18 more school days
Date: Thu, 11 May 1989 19:47

19 lines
1116 bytes

In 9858 rodman@mfci.UUCP (Paul Rodman) sez:
>Personally, I wouldn't mind a comp.arch.highend vs lowend. I 
>get bored with the small systems slant of this bboard. 

	What about comp.arch.risc ?

	You don't have to have an exact definition for it
	to have a news group for it.  :-) 

	That would at least put the 600x0/80x86 stuff in a 
	different place from the RISC stuff.

	--chris

-- 
@---@  -----------------------------------------------------------------  @---@
\. ./  | Chris (The Lab Rat) Quenelle      cquenel@polyslo.calpoly.edu |  \. ./
 \ /   |  You can keep my things, they've come to take me home -- PG   |   \ / 
==o==  -----------------------------------------------------------------  ==o==

Technical Details

Message-ID: <11294@polyslo.CalPoly.EDU>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cwjcc!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!unmvax!polyslo!cquenel

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cwjcc!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!unmvax!polyslo!cquenel
From: cquenel@polyslo.CalPoly.EDU (18 more school days)
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Sub groups ?
Message-ID: <11294@polyslo.CalPoly.EDU>
Date: 11 May 89 19:47:48 GMT
Reply-To: cquenel@polyslo.CalPoly.EDU (18 more school days)
Organization: Blue Blaze Irregulars
Lines: 19