Article View: comp.arch
Article #21228Re: 80486 vs. 68040 code size [real
From: aglew
Date: Fri, 12 May 1989 15:07
Date: Fri, 12 May 1989 15:07
7 lines
704 bytes
704 bytes
>the 68030 has been around nearly as long as the 68030. >Peter da Silva, Xenix Support, Ferranti International Controls Corporation. Well, I should hope so! Otherwise - existential processors! (Thanks - this typo made my day)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<28200310@mcdurb>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!unmvax!deimos.cis.ksu.edu!uxc!uxc.cso.uiuc.edu!mcdurb!aglewReferences:
<19413@winchester.mips.COM>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!unmvax!deimos.cis.ksu.edu!uxc!uxc.cso.uiuc.edu!mcdurb!aglew From: aglew@mcdurb.Urbana.Gould.COM Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: Re: 80486 vs. 68040 code size [real Message-ID: <28200310@mcdurb> Date: 12 May 89 15:07:00 GMT References: <19413@winchester.mips.COM> Lines: 7 Nf-ID: #R:winchester.mips.COM:19413:mcdurb:28200310:000:228 Nf-From: mcdurb.Urbana.Gould.COM!aglew May 12 10:07:00 1989