Re: IEEE 754 vs. 854 (floating-point arithmetic)

Article View: comp.arch

Article #21498

#21498

From: Dik T. Winter
Date: Tue, 30 May 1989 23:34

11 lines
820 bytes

In article <6@pzbaum.uucp> jimv@pzbaum.UUCP (Jim Valerio) writes:
 >   (1)	Replace subnormal/denormal numbers by a single value (call it epsilon
 >	or infinitesimal), and define arithmetic underflow in terms of this
 >	limiting value.
 
One of the nice things of denormalized numbers is that addition and subtraction
cannot underflow.
-- 
dik t. winter, cwi, amsterdam, nederland
INTERNET   : dik@cwi.nl
BITNET/EARN: dik@mcvax

Technical Details

Message-ID: <8156@boring.cwi.nl>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!mcvax!dik

References: <72135@pyramid.pyramid.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!mcvax!dik
From: dik@cwi.nl (Dik T. Winter)
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: IEEE 754 vs. 854 (floating-point arithmetic)
Keywords: floating-point exceptions
Message-ID: <8156@boring.cwi.nl>
Date: 30 May 89 23:34:40 GMT
References: <72135@pyramid.pyramid.com>
Organization: CWI, Amsterdam
Lines: 11

Reply to Parent Message