🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.arch
Article #21713

Re: 386/486 Virtual Memory Question...

#21713
From: John R. Levine
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 1989 16:46
25 lines
2026 bytes
In article <243@mipos3.intel.com> sundar@mipos2.intel.com (Sundar Iyengar~) writes:
>Page 2-2 of the 80386 Programmer's Ref Manual
>says this: "Applications programmers view the logical address space of
>the 80386 as a collection of 16,383 one-dimensional subspaces, each
>with a specified length [ranging] from one byte upto a maximum
>of 2^32 bytes".

Unfortunately, since all 2^46 addresses are mapped through a page table with
only room for 2^32 addresses, the 386's segmentation is considerably less
useful than it might otherwise be.  If, for example, you did the obvious
unix trick of putting your static data and heap at the low end of a segment
where it can grow up, and your stack at the high end of the segment where it
can grow down, you have to map all 2^32 addresses in that segment into the
page table, but that doesn't leave room for anything else.  Oops.

A single process' address space is limited to 2^32 simultaneously mapped
addresses. In theory you could have a larger total address space and play
games with mapping segments in and out, but that puts strange limits on
applications as to which segments they can reference at the same time, so in
reality the limit translates to 2^32 total addresses per process. Unix systems
map all segments to the same place and just use the paging.
-- 
John R. Levine, Segue Software, POB 349, Cambridge MA 02238, +1 617 492 3869
{ bbn | spdcc | decvax | harvard | yale }!ima!johnl, Levine@YALE.something
Massachusetts has 64 licensed drivers who are over 100 years old.  -The Globe
Technical Details
Message-ID: <4056@ima.ima.isc.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!decwrl!decvax!ima!johnl
References: <243@mipos3.intel.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!decwrl!decvax!ima!johnl
From: johnl@ima.ima.isc.com (John R. Levine)
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: 386/486 Virtual Memory Question...
Summary: 386 segments aren't very useful
Message-ID: <4056@ima.ima.isc.com>
Date: 12 Jun 89 16:46:58 GMT
References: <243@mipos3.intel.com>
Reply-To: johnl@ima.UUCP (John R. Levine)
Organization: Segue Software, Inc.
Lines: 25